Define

The app didn’t suffer from a lack of features; it suffered from misplaced priorities. The tools worked, but they were buried under confusing layers.
So I reframed the challenge:
How might I reorganize the app’s menus so users can confidently track inventory and discover cocktails without feeling lost?

The Research Findings

From my observational research and competitor analysis, several patterns emerged:

Usability Findings

  • Navigation Confusion: Users often opened the wrong menu first and backtracked multiple times.

  • Hidden Inventory: Inventory — the heart of the app — was buried behind secondary menus, reducing its use.

  • Cognitive Overload: Too many nested options, inconsistent labeling, and unclear hierarchy caused hesitation and frustration.

  • Misaligned Flows: The app expects users to update inventory first, then browse recipes — but most users start by searching for a drink.

Behavioral Insights

  • Users think in scenarios (“What can I make with what I have?”), not categories (“Inventory,” “Recipes,” “Favourites”).

  • They value speed and simplicity over deep customization.

  • They want the app to act like a bartender, offering confident, immediate recommendations.

Business Insight

Improving discoverability and ease-of-use could increase engagement and encourage consistent inventory tracking — a key differentiator for this app.

Key Takeaway

The app’s success depends on restructuring navigation around user goals, not internal feature groupings.

Mapping the Journey

I mapped a typical user flow for “Find a cocktail I can make right now.”
Current Journey (Before):

  1. Open app → 2. See overwhelming list of recipes → 3. Select option → 4. Check inventory → 5. Return to recipes → 6. Scroll extensively → 7. Finally land on a cocktail.

Pain Points:

  • A lot of choices presented at once, leading to choice confusion. Filters are work.

  • Confusing terminology (no education of what a highball glass is for beginners).

  • Cognitive fatigue after a few loops.

Ideal Journey (After):

  1. Open app → 2. See personalized “Cocktails You Can Make” at the top → 3. Tap recipe → 4. Mix drink.

Shift: From 6–7 steps with high frustration → 3 seamless steps with clarity.

Research Goals

Determine what to simplify or change the app navigation to support users goals.

Research Objectives

  • Understand how users think about finding cocktails (by ingredient, by name, or by vibe).

  • Identify how the current menu structure supports common workflows.

  • Reveal any mental models users bring from similar apps or recipe experiences.

Competitor Research

I compared other available cocktail applications

User Interviews

To better understand who uses this app and why, I conducted 5 informal interviews with friends who regularly enjoy making cocktails at home. Each represented a slightly different user type, from aspiring mixologists to casual hosts.

Objective

Explore habits, frustrations, and expectations around cocktail-making and bar inventory management to validate my assumptions and uncover hidden needs.

Key Questions

  • How often do you make cocktails at home?

  • How do you currently decide what to make?

  • How do you keep track of your ingredients?

  • What frustrates you about your current process?

  • What would make a cocktail app most useful or delightful to you?

  • Are there steps of the process to making a cocktail that are currently taking place outside the application?

Insights

  • Decision Fatigue: Most users said they struggle to choose what to make, even when they have plenty of ingredients.

  • Inventory Management Is a Chore: Few track what they have accurately; manual entry feels tedious.

  • Recipe Overload: Current apps feel cluttered or too generic — users want relevance, not volume.

  • Delight in Discovery: When the app surfaces a cocktail they can make, excitement spikes.

  • Design Matters: A few noted they abandon apps that feel clunky or visually outdated — the experience should feel “crafty” and “premium.”

Key Takeaway

The app’s biggest opportunity isn’t adding new features; it’s about simplifying decisions, streamlining inventory, and delivering relevance and joy through thoughtful design and curated discovery.

Understanding Through Observation

To deepen understanding, I observed five friends using the app with a simple prompt:
“Find a cocktail you can make right now with what’s in your bar.”
I watched quietly as they tried to navigate the app.

Observations

  • Confusion: Several opened the wrong menu first, unsure where to begin.

  • Redundancy: Many circled back through multiple menus trying to find the same recipes.

  • Frustration: One participant sighed, “I just want it to tell me what I can make! Why is this so difficult?”

  • Workarounds: Two users resorted to jotting ingredients down elsewhere rather than updating inventory in-app.

Insights

Users expect one clear entry point for their primary goal: discovering makeable cocktails.
Information hierarchy doesn’t match user priorities; “Inventory” feels buried even though it drives recommendations.
Users think in tasks, not features; they don’t want to explore every menu; they want outcomes (“Show me what I can make”).
The current menu structure violates common mental models; users anticipate a “home → action” path, not deep nesting.

Define